University of PennsylvaniaSchool of Arts and SciencesPeopleFacultyAdministrativeFacilitiesComputingGreenhouseMachine ShopOther
> People
> Department of Biology
> School of Arts and Sciences
> University of Pennsylvania
Department of Biology People
 

Tatyana Svitkina, PhD

Assistant Professor of Biology
Ph.D., Russian Cancer Research Center, 1979
v

221 Leidy Lab
Department of Biology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

V

+1 215 898.5736

F

+1 215 898.8780

E

svitkina@sas.upenn.edu

research : publications : organizations

how cells move: molecular hardware of cell motility

Individual cells in multicellular organisms are able to move. This ability is essential for virtually every aspect of the whole body functioning. Cell motility is a complicated multi-step process, which begins from making a decision to move, which occurs at the cell surface. When surface receptors receive external signals, they initiate a signaling cascade inside the cell and issue commands to the cytoskeleton to generate motility. Cytoskeleton is a complex of detergent-resistant cytoplasmic components, which may be considered as molecular hardware for motility. The major question of my research is how this molecular hardware works.


Fig. 1: Main components of the fibroblast cytoskeleton.
Actin filaments (yellow), microtubules (red), and
intermediate filaments (blue).
Platinum replica\electron microscopy.

The design of an unknown machine can be understood based on how its elements are structurally arranged, how they move during action, and what happens if some element is missing. My experimental approach is based on the same idea applied to cells and molecules. I use platinum replica electron microscopy (EM) to analyze the structural organization of the cytoskeleton at the nanometer scale level. This EM technique reveals a fascinating world of the cell interior and frequently gives simple answers to complicated questions. Since EM is not applicable to living cells, to see the machinery in action I use correlative analysis, in which the dynamic observation of a cell is followed by EM of the same cell.


Fig. 2: Correlative light and electron microscopy.
After phase-contrast microscopy of a living Xenopus fibroblast (left),
the sample was processed for platinum replica electron microscopy,
and the cell is re-localized (right). This technique allows to correlate
motility with the cytoskeleton organization.

This approach allows establishing functional connections between cytoskeletal dynamics and supramolecular organization. Functional perturbations of specific molecules give further insight into details of the molecular design of cellular motile machinery.

Cell locomotion consists of repeated cycles of leading edge protrusion followed by cell body translocation. The current focus of my research is to understand the mechanisms of leading edge protrusion. Protrusion is driven by polymerization of actin, the major structural and functional element of the cytoskeleton. Actin filaments through interaction with different sets of accessory proteins are able to form a remarkable variety of superstructures with different design and functions.

Lamellipodia and filopodia are the two major protrusive organelles with strikingly different structural organization and different sets of molecular players. Different cell types use these two organelles to a different extent. Lamellipodia, which are broad, flat protrusions are filled with a branched network of actin filaments. The current model of actin dynamics in lamellipodia (“array treadmilling model”) describes it as a cycle of dendritic nucleation, elongation, capping, and depolymerization of actin filaments.


Fig. 3: Dendritic actin network in fibroblast lamellipodium.
Individual families of branching filaments are highlighted
in different colors.

Filopodia, which are thin cellular processes, contain a tight bundle of parallel actin filaments, which elongate at the tip and depolymerize from the rear, as described by the filament treadmilling model.


Fig 4: Assembly of the filopodial bundle occurs at the tip,
similar to how the tower is built. As a result, the history
of the construction is imprinted in the design of the
structure allowing to understand how the filopodium was built.

We recently showed that filopodia are formed by reorganization of the lamellipodial dendritic network in a process which we called “convergent elongation”. A special structure at filopodial tips, the filopodial tip complex, functions as an organizing center for filopodia formation.

Although basic models for the leading edge protrusion have been formulated, many questions remain about the molecular design of the protrusive machinery and specific roles of individual molecules. Many proteins have been found to localize to “the scene of crime”, but their roles in actin machinery remain unknown. My strategy is to employ a combination of powerful structural, dynamic, and functional approaches to investigate roles of potentially important proteins. When these pieces of information come together, they always produce something novel and exciting.

 

 

selected publications

Biyasheva, A., Svitkina, T., Kunda, P., Baum, B., and Borisy, G. (2004) Cascade pathway of filopodia formation downstream of SCAR. J. Cell Sci. 117:837-848.

Vignjevic, D., Yarar, D., Welch, M.D., Peloquin, J., Svitkina, T., and Borisy, G.G. (2003) Formation of filopodia-like bundles in vitro from a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160:951-962.

Svitkina, T.M., Bulanova, E.A., Chaga, O.Y., Vignjevic, D.M., Kojima, S., Vasiliev, J.M., and Borisy, G.G. (2003) Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160:409-421.

Bear, J.E., Svitkina, T.M., Krause, M., Schafer, D.A., Loureiro, J.J., Strasser, G.A., Maly, I.V., Chaga, O.Y., Cooper, J.A., Borisy, G.G., and Gertler, F.B. (2002) Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility. Cell 109:509-521.

Cameron, L.A., Svitkina, T.M., Vignjevic, D., Theriot, J.A., and Borisy, G.G. (2001) Dendritic organization of actin comet tails. Curr. Biol. 11:130-135.

Borisy, G.G. and Svitkina, T.M. (2000) Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:104-112. Review.

Svitkina, T.M. and Borisy, G.G. (1999) Progress in protrusion: The tell-tale scar. Trends Biochem Sci. 24:432-436. Review.

Svitkina, T.M. and Borisy, G.G. (1999) Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J. Cell Biol. 145:1009-1026.

Svitkina, T.M. and Borisy, G.G. (1998) Correlative light and electron microscopy of the cytoskeleton of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol.; 298:570-592.

Svitkina, T.M., Verkhovsky, A.B., McQuade, K.M., and Borisy, G.G. (1997) Analysis of the actin-myosin II system in fish epidermal keratocytes: Mechanism of cell body translocation. J. Cell Biol. 139:397-415.

Svitkina, T.M., Verkhovsky, A.B., and Borisy, G.G. (1996) Plectin sidearms mediate interaction of intermediate filaments with microtubules and other components of the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 135:991-1007.

 

organizations

American Society for Cell Biology


People
Department of Biology
School of Arts and Sciences
University of Pennsylvania

last updated July 31, 2006